Return-Path: <sarah@amazecrust.online>
Delivered-To: info@sterlingcal.com
Received: from reseller401.webserversystems.com
	by reseller401.webserversystems.com with LMTP
	id +DbqLNRW42LkbAAAchKAPA
	(envelope-from <sarah@amazecrust.online>)
	for <info@sterlingcal.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 22:41:08 -0500
Return-path: <sarah@amazecrust.online>
Envelope-to: info@sterlingcal.com
Delivery-date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 22:41:08 -0500
Received: from lte41.amazecrust.online ([159.89.176.250]:36616)
	by reseller401.webserversystems.com with esmtps  (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <sarah@amazecrust.online>)
	id 1oHGs8-0008xE-A5
	for info@sterlingcal.com; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 22:41:08 -0500
Received: from [104.223.121.150] (unknown [104.223.121.150])
	by lte41.amazecrust.online (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0D15411634F6
	for <info@sterlingcal.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 03:17:28 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: Mail message body
To: info@sterlingcal.com
From: sarah@amazecrust.online
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 03:17:27 -0700
Reply-To: sarah.marketing25@gmail.com
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=10.9
X-Spam-Score: 109
X-Spam-Bar: ++++++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "reseller401.webserversystems.com",
 has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 root\@localhost for details.
 
 Content preview:  Hello, My name is Sarah Brown and I work for a Digital Marketing
    Agency located in South Florida. On your website, I found a few technical
    mistakes. A brief report with a list of the problems is being prepared for
    you by one of the digital marketers. 
 
 Content analysis details:   (10.9 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  3.0 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
                             bl.spamcop.net
             [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?104.223.121.150>]
 -0.5 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  1.5 DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12   Date: is 6 to 12 hours after Received: date
  0.5 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in
                             digit
                             [sarah.marketing25[at]gmail.com]
  2.5 DCC_CHECK              No description available.
  2.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD
 -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE   No description available.
  0.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
  0.0 FSL_BULK_SIG           Bulk signature with no Unsubscribe
  1.0 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From
  0.9 FROM_NTLD_REPLY_FREEMAIL From abused NTLD and Reply-To is
                             FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject: [SPAM] Re: Content Error.

Hello,

My name is Sarah Brown and I work for a Digital Marketing Agency located in=
 South Florida.

On your website, I found a few technical mistakes. A brief report with a li=
st of the problems is being prepared for you by one of the digital marketer=
s.

I thought you may find it interesting and probably a core reason why your o=
nline visibility is not increasing.

Can I send the report to you or is there someone else I should send it to?

Kind regards,
Sarah Brown
Website Analyst

Note: - If you are not interested, please reply back =E2=80=9CREMOVE=E2=80=
=9D in the subject line.
